Jonatan: Whoa! Moar IOSYS pl00000x! B-) (August 26, 2008, 7:09 pm)

meh: The misspelled "4" in the clock-dial bugs me... (August 26, 2008, 7:27 pm)

ga: #2 how is the '4' misspelled? I can see IV (August 26, 2008, 7:28 pm)

Ithos: #2 learn the roman numbers BEFORE you burn Rome IV or iv for four VI or vi for six (August 26, 2008, 9:38 pm)

Humpas: Song anyone? =) (August 26, 2008, 9:52 pm)

meh: Misspelled as in most roman-numeral clock dials have the number "4" written "IIII" instead of "IV". Even if "IV" is correct, the traditional way is "IIII". Mostly for aesthetic purposes. So by typing it as "IV" just tells that you're a nooblet and havent stublaad enough references pics. Also the pendulums "bending point" is too low... (August 27, 2008, 3:44 pm)

od: darn awesome song! i need name of it :D (August 27, 2008, 3:55 pm)

Zalsa: The notation of Roman numerals has varied through the centuries. Originally, it was common to use IIII to represent four, because IV represented the Roman god Jupiter, whose Latin name, IVPPITER, begins with IV. The subtractive notation (which uses IV instead of IIII) has become universally used only in modern times. For example, Forme of Cury, a manuscript from 1390, uses IX for nine, but IIII for four. Another document in the same manuscript, from 1381, uses IV and IX. A third document in the same manuscript uses IIII, IV, and IX. Constructions such as IIIII for five, IIX for eight or VV for 10 have also been discovered. Subtractive notation arose from regular Latin ublaa: the number 18 was duodeviginti or “two from twenty”; the number 19 was undeviginti or "one from twenty". The use of subtractive notation increased the complexity of performing Roman arithmetic, without conveying the benefits of a full positional notation system. tl;dr You're all stupid; nothing you can do about it. and that includes even you who say IIII is traditionally correct. Clock is clearly quite modern for roman standards; logically, modern ublaa of roman numerals are present. (August 27, 2008, 11:14 pm)

Zalsa: Stupid wordfilter >-( (August 27, 2008, 11:16 pm)

moo: You truly are the Roman expert, over 143 barbarians slain (August 28, 2008, 1:16 am)

meh: #8 Youre missing the whole point. I was talking about how it was written on a clock-dial. Not how its in general... (August 28, 2008, 5:48 am)

gblaaah: very nice iosys mv ! 5p song ? song was awsum (August 28, 2008, 9:29 am)

Humpas: IOSYS - Artifical Children At least that's what I found =/ (August 28, 2008, 3:10 pm)

Ninku: IOSYS-TouhouSuisuiSuusuu You can snatch it on http://www.doujinstyle.com/ (August 28, 2008, 4:04 pm)

Ninku: And that was the Album. (August 28, 2008, 4:06 pm)

Saiko: I feel empty after watching... Awesome song though, as always! (September 7, 2008, 7:45 pm)

Anon: Sad sounding - one of their better tunes. Also, great animation as usual. (November 3, 2008, 4:11 am)

MAX: I like how the flame on the candle casts a shadow. That makes a lot of sense. (November 10, 2008, 3:30 pm)

Konata: The song is Artificial Cildren Japanese title is アーティフィシャル・チルドレン The Album is 東方萃翠酒酔 (March 4, 2009, 6:07 am)

str8forthakill: This flash dont have that good sound, too bad i cant rip any better than the source. Anyway nice song, i share my rips. http://solidfiles.com/d/4Ent (February 11, 2010, 11:35 pm)

str8forthakill: Sorry my first rip's wasn't perfected, i installed better codecs and changed some settings, much better now, old files deleted. http://solidfiles.com/d/vl45 (February 12, 2010, 3:08 am)

Anon: IT'S TOO AWESOME (July 8, 2010, 5:09 am)

ipaqmaster: The Awesomeness! (July 17, 2010, 7:16 am)

All comments can be found from here: Comments for toho01_01_take.swf

(Music video - IOSYS - Touhou Artificial Children)

Navigation: Dagobah Flash Gallery

Tags for toho01_01_take.swf: Music video - IOSYS - Touhou Artificial Children